• Welcome to realmuscleforum.com
  • 2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

    Discussion in 'General Chat' started by baletki, Mar 31, 2012.

    1. ismiju

      ismiju Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 2011
      Posts:
      984
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      Don't see why it would, unless you mention everyone in option 2 are Muslim lol.

      Disclaimer: I'm not racist nor was that an act of racism, just going off of typical responses to religions from previous threads. Muchos racimos!
       
    2. suighja

      suighja Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 2010
      Posts:
      39,860
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      Find a way to save everyone because im Batman, YEaaaaa.
       
    3. jailynn24hb

      jailynn24hb Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      82,194
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      There are harder versions where you can add such premises, but in this case you dunno
       
    4. Korporalegq

      Korporalegq Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 2010
      Posts:
      33,874
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      colateral damage kill em all make it fair
       
    5. jailynn24hb

      jailynn24hb Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      82,194
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      call it friendly fire
       
    6. crormaSoila18

      crormaSoila18 Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 2011
      Posts:
      38,235
      Likes Received:
      0
      2 groups, 3 choices, 3 outcomes. What would you do?

      I chose option 2 but swayed a lot towards 3.

      By choosing option 2 I technically kill 10 people.
      By choosing option 3 and disengaging myself with the situation and removing my say then the decision should fall to somebody else in which case I kill no-one. However, I felt the third to be immoral. If all people were upstanding citizens then it's surely human nature to want to help other humans and save lives. Like FMJ said, damage limitation comes in to play.
       

    Share This Page

    1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
      Dismiss Notice